Every integrity and quality check, in one review, with evidence that holds up.
When a concern arrives, start from evidence rather than a blank page. A maximum-depth review of any paper, submitted or published, with every finding traced to its source and a record shaped for your committee.
- suspected
Panel overlaps a figure in another paper
traced · Fig. 3b - suspected
Cited work is flagged as retracted
traced · Ref. 22 - suspected
Reported values disagree with the table
traced · Table 2
One review, every lens.
A case rarely turns on one signal. The full scan runs across all three families of check, and your focus decides which of them leads.
Internal manuscript integrity
- AI-generated text signals
- Image manipulation
- Image duplication
- AI-generated images
- Graph & chart duplication
- Statistical validation & consistency
- Figure–legend consistency
- Claim & citation consistency
External checks & requirements
- Image & graph plagiarism
- Retracted reference detection
- Hallucinated / non-existent references
- DOI, link & metadata accuracy
- Citation patterns
- Data & code availability
- Paper-mill signals
- Author identity & affiliation
- Funder requirements
- Journal author guidelines
- Reporting-standard alignment
Research quality
- Methods & rigor
- Reproducibility
- Replicability
- Research ethics
- Novelty & contribution
- Peer-review-grade analysis
Start from evidence, not a blank page.
A concern is a question that needs a defensible answer. Octym gives your team the full picture: fast, documented, and traced.
Evidence, assembled
A full evidence-backed review instead of a screenshot and a hunch: image forensics, text, references, data, every finding traced to its source.
Any paper
Submitted or already published. The review runs the same forensic depth on both.
Built for your committee
A record shaped for your standards: reviewable, defensible, and never an accusation. A person always decides.
- Image duplicationtraced · Fig. 3b
Matched against a figure in the published literature.
- Image manipulationtraced · Fig. 1
Splice boundary detected in the panel.
- Reference → retractiontraced · Ref. 14
Cited paper is flagged as retracted.
- Text overlaptraced · p. 4
Passage overlaps a prior publication.
- Data consistencytraced · Table 3
Reported values reconcile with the figure.
Every finding documented and traced to its source, built for a case file. A person adjudicates.
From concern to committee.
The full forensic scan always runs; your focus decides what leads and how deep the concern is pursued.
A concern arrives
A reader's letter, a whistleblower, a routine audit. Any paper, published or not.
Maximum-depth review
Every lens, forensic depth, with extra depth where the concern points.
A committee-ready record
Every finding documented with its evidence and source, shaped for your process.
Your office sets the focus.
What leads, how deep, and how the record is shaped. You decide; your Octym team makes it happen.
You decide
What your reviews lead with (images, text, or data) and the depth each case demands.
Your Octym team builds it
New case types, new evidentiary standards, a different record format: configured for you.
It changes when you do
As your committee's standards evolve, the record evolves with them.
Image & figure integrity is powered by Proofig, a trusted leader in scientific image integrity, adopted by leading journals and trusted by the world's top researchers, publishers, and research institutes.
Questions, answered.
See it on a case.
Contact us. We'll configure Octym for your committee's standards.
Analyzed on private servers. Never used to train models.