Every integrity and quality check, in one review, configured for each journal you run.
From submission screening to post-publication investigation, for your editorial and integrity desks alike. One platform, configured to each journal's own requirements by your Octym team.
- Journal ANovelty-led
- Novelty & contribution
- Image & figure integrity
- Replicability signals
- Journal BRigor-led
- Methods & rigor
- Statistical & analytical consistency
- Image & figure integrity
- Journal CHigh volume
- Image & figure integrity
- Retracted references
- Reporting completeness
One review, every lens.
Whatever a journal chooses to lead with, the same three families of check are available on every submission. Your configuration decides what runs and what leads.
Internal manuscript integrity
- AI-generated text signals
- Image manipulation
- Image duplication
- AI-generated images
- Graph & chart duplication
- Statistical & analytical consistency
- Figure–legend consistency
- Claim & citation consistency
- Internal consistency
- Prior publication & reuse disclosure
External checks & requirements
- Image & graph plagiarism
- Retracted reference detection
- Hallucinated / non-existent references
- DOI & metadata resolution
- Reference analytics
- Data & code availability
- Paper-mill signals
- Authorship & affiliation consistency
- Funder requirements
- Submission requirements & completeness
Research quality
- Methods & rigor
- Reproducibility
- Replicability signals
- Research ethics
- Novelty & contribution
- Peer-review-grade analysis
Editorial and integrity teams each get their own Octym.
Different desks, different jobs, different review profiles, all on one platform, without separate logins.
Editorial offices
Editors · managing editors · editorial assistants
Every submission screened against your journal's own rules before review time is spent, including the paper-mill signals worth catching ahead of peer review: the major risks first, each linked to its evidence, exportable for the record.
Integrity teams
Integrity managers · post-publication reviewers
When a reader raises a concern about a published paper, start from a full evidence-backed review, with every finding traced to its source, shaped for a defensible decision.
Major issues
- High signalFigure 2traced · Fig. 2b
Possible duplication with Figure 4a.
- ElevatedReferencestraced · Ref. 14
Reference 14 appears in Retraction Watch.
Then review
- MediumStatisticstraced · Table 3
Reported p-value differs from the recomputed test.
- ClearEthicstraced · Methods ¶6
Ethics statement present and consistent.
Every journal is different. So is every review.
No two journals share the same instructions for authors, the same article types, or the same worries. Your Octym team configures each journal's review to its own rules: which checks run, which one leads, and what it is measured against. One title leads with novelty and contribution; another leaves it out entirely and spends that attention on rigor and reproducibility.
One publisher · two journals · two reviews
Each journal gets its own set of checks and its own emphasis.
Lives on novelty
- Novelty & contributionDeep
- Claim & citation consistencyDeep
- Reference verificationStandard
- Image & figure integrityStandard
- Reporting completenessLight
- Replicability signalsOff
Built on experimental rigor
- Methods & rigorDeep
- Statistical & analytical consistencyDeep
- ReproducibilityStandard
- Image & figure integrityStandard
- Reporting completenessDeep
- Novelty & contributionOff
Same desk. Two journals. Two different reviews.
Adding a journal is a configuration, not a development cycle.
The right check, at the right moment.
The same platform follows a manuscript from the day it arrives to long after it's published.
At submission
Screened against your journal's rules (structure, figures, references, statistics) before review time is spent.
At revision
Run the review again on the revised version, so the figures the authors replaced are checked, not only the ones that were screened.
After publication
When a concern is raised, a maximum-depth review of the published paper, with every finding traced to its source.
Your configuration is yours.
What runs, what leads, and when it changes. You decide; your Octym team makes it happen.
You decide
Which checks run for each journal, what leads the review, how deep it goes.
Your Octym team builds it
A new journal, a new rule, a new focus. Tell them, and it's configured for you.
It changes when you do
Instructions for authors evolve, article types appear, worries shift. Your review keeps up.
Image & figure integrity is powered by Proofig, a trusted leader in scientific image integrity, adopted by leading journals and publishers.
Journal review profiles are configured with you at onboarding, each to the journal's own instructions for authors. Adding a journal later is a configuration, not a project.
Questions, answered.
See it on your journals.
Tell us how your journals review. We'll configure Octym around them.
Analyzed on private servers. Never used to train models.